How has the UK government intervened in the affairs of the railways Essay

How has the UK government intervened in the affairs of the railways since the early nineteenth century Should the industry be publically or privately owned - Essay Example The services rendered trough the inherent administration of the railway that often encountered both public and private interventions. Government institutions in various states have led to the expansion of the rail sectors. Thus, there is an increased scope relating to the delivery of infrastructural services between the public and the private sector (Morales, Wittek, and Heyse, 2012, p.242). Development of the private sector and participation in the delivery of infrastructural services attribute to the capability of the sector to deliver efficient services. For example, in the public railway developments, the average actual projects are higher than the costs estimated. Indeed, the delivery of the railway services and the entire public infrastructure associates itself with inefficiencies and excessive costs. Essentially, the problems facing the provision of the railway services have the intervention of many players. The situation intervenes to align the delivery of the rail service to the benefit of the public good. In addition, the UK government has been a critical player in the execution of rail interventions to elicit better services to her citizens (Medda and Pels, 2012, p.645). Merchants and manufacturers had tried to advance the status of the road network in the 18th century by creating turnpike trusts. The schemes gained momentum during the second half of the 18th century and amid the 19th century. Undisputedly, there were nearly 22,000 miles and 104,770 miles of turnpike roads and parish highways respectively. These roads spread throughout England and the Wales. During the 18th century, there was unreliable road transport service because of the appalling conditions and unreliability because of wet weather observed in Britain. The maintenance of roads was a nightmare due to neglect from the state. It was the duty of the local labourers and unpaid farmers to carry out