Science Is Value Neutral Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

knowledge Is Value Neutral - Essay ExampleIt is the intuitive feeling thatt he universe is governed by rational laws, and that through careful experimentation we substructure observe them. The problem, however, is that acquirement is not simply about understanding, because each tonic breakthrough of understanding can also lead to a practical breakthrough that affects how we live our lives. These effects are one of the major reasons people designate value to science. One of the main sticking points many people have with science is that it allows world to play god (Stevenson, Byerly 20). In other words, science allows humans to far surpass our natural abilities and do things we could never have dreamt of previously. Depending on ones point of view, this could be anything from a very meritless to a very, very good thing. To some, the idea humans having the ability to far surpass our natural abilities is terrifying. ... These people would point to, for instance, the fact that no one should have to tolerate a child due to a childhood illness, and the science, by allowing humans to play god, has allowed us to save lives and create a better, healthier, happier place for everyone in the world. In this conception science is a beautiful and laudable thing, a good thing, and human progress measured by science is excellent. Both the previously verbalise arguments, that science is evil and that science is good are, on their surfaces, correct. But this means that both are absolutely incorrect. Yes, science can lead to some imposing and horribly destructive things many lives have ended because of weapons brought about by science, many people perhaps live less actualized and happy lives because of the way science has affected their worldview, and, possibly worst of all, science has been used to justify some of the most horrific things known to man like racist justifications of biological supremacy. Science certainly has a lot to answer for. On the other hand, one wo uld have to be blind not to recognize the way science has heighten and enriched peoples lives, from giving an amputee a new leg that works as well as the one they lost, or allowing loved ones to spend a few more(prenominal) years together due to breakthroughs in modern medicine. So does one figure out the value of science by weighing the good against the bad? By saying this scientifically created land mine made the child need a new limb in the first place, so all the way the bad in science wins out or vice versa? No. The answer is rather that science is a tool, and that like any tool it can be used for good or evil. The term playing