The Armistice of 1850

The Armistice of 1850 With the whimsy of their young countrys manifest destiny, and victory over Mexico in the Mexican-American War, the United States of America conquered most of the western portion of their continent. eyepatch obtaining large territories of come to through victories from warfare and at the cost of bargained prices, this sublime republic found itself with an immense crisis sitting deep down the palms of their hands. As the cash advance of the United States came through territorial reserve gains, their triumphant progress was met with digression.Although new territories were down the stairs the possession of the United States, m whatsoever leaders of this powerful state of matter were faint-hearted whether their saucily acquired land was fit to be a territory of clear soil or bondage. While many proposed arguments for pro- thraldom land, many counter acted with gratuitous soil proposals and arguments. During the year of 1850, the United States of Amer ica managed to shut up the tension amid those at opposite spectrums of this confrontation through the agree of 1850.Before the passage of the agree of 1850, many of the United States leaders found themselves at odds with unitary and only(a) an opposite. John C. Calhoun, a public all(prenominal)y known pro-slavery congresswoman, believed that slavery should not pull in been excluded from territories prior to admission to state hood. Calhoun thought that sexual congress did not keep back the power to regulate slavery in the nations newly acquired territories.In Calhouns Speech on the Admission of California- and the General State of the pairing, he assesses the nature of the Union and the needs for its overall preservation. In the beginning of Calhouns speech, he clearly believed that the state of the Union was at harm delinquent to its division, and was at the verge of great disaster and disunion. Although Calhoun did not provide a solution for the unity of the country, h e did on the other hand suggest that the power of the Union rested upon the northeasternern majority. At that eon thither was nearly a perfect equilibrium between the two, which afforded ample direction to each to protect itself against the aggression of the other but, as it now stands, one(a) section has the exclusive power of controlling the Government, which leaves the other with reveal any fit means of protecting itself against its encroachment and oppression, wrote Calhoun. Calhoun justified his opinion on the North oppressing the southmost through the Souths deprivation of territory in the Northwest Ordinance, the Missouri Compromise, and the Oregon Territory.Calhoun, like the other representatives of the southern states, agnize that the foot of slavery would either have to be fought for or the Union would eventually abolish it. It will be found in the look of the people of the southerly States, as prevalent as the discontent itself, that they cannot remain, as things now are, consistently with honor and safety, in the Union, stated the Congressman. Calhoun believed that the South had no via media to offer to the North, but only that of the Constitution.The Congressman placed the lode and the responsibility of the preservation of the nation within the Northerners hands. Opposed to Calhouns view, Congressman David Wilmot believed that the institution of slavery should have been banned from all the newly acquired territory of the west. He was adamant that Congress possessed the power to regulate slavery in these new territories. David Wilmots Wilmot Proviso urged the banning of slavery within any territory acquired fromMexico from theMexican American Waror any territory acquired in the future. Provided,That, as an express and fundamental condition to the acquirement of any territory from the Republic of Mexico by the United States, by virtue of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the Executive of the moneys herein appropriated, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever experience in any part of said territory, except for crime, whereof the party shall primary be duly convicted, wrote Wilmot. Although the Wilmot Proviso was an unsuccessful amendment, Wilmots view of barren soil became a rallying point for opponents of slavery.Wilmot was adamant that all land gained within the United States of America should be free of slavery. While Calhoun and Wilmot present the extreme views of the pro-slavery South and the free soil North, the Compromise of 1850 managed to settle the sectioned divided views of Congress for the short term. TheCompromise of 1850was an amalgamation of eight unambiguous orders which managed to ease the confrontation between thefree states of the North and the slave statesof theSouthin regards to the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War.The compromise was drafted byKentucky Congressman, hydrogen Clay, in which avoidedSouthern secession, reduc ed sectioned conflict, and prevented civil war. The Compromise of 1850 allowed for California to be admitted as one of the States of the Union, as long as it was a free state. It as well as banned slavery in Washington D. C. Resolved, That it is inexpedient to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia. This compromise also made Texas surrender its peal to the Rio del Norte to New Mexico, and allowed Texas to transfer its debt to that the national government.The Compromise of1850 also prohibited Congress from introducing or excluding slavery from the nations newly acquired territory, and ordered that the territorial governments were to decide upon the issue of slavery. In other words, the new territories actions on the institution of slavery came from popular sovereignty. Although slave trade was prohibited from Washington D. C. , the compromise managed to preserve slavery, while demanding for the restitution and delivery of persons bound to service or labor in any State, who ma y escape into any other State or Territory in the Union.Northerners became infuriated of the conceit that runaway slaves, upon capture, were to be returned to their masters of the South. This precedent became known as The transient Slave Act of 1850. This act became the sole prize of the South for their compromise in allowing the admission of California to be a free state. not only did the South manage to keep their traditional ways of enslaving Africans, or African Americans, but they also managed to gain more power over their slaves.While many viewed the Compromise of 1850 with pleasure, William Seward opposed Clays compromise which managed to instance momentary peace within the Union. Seward found discontent with the compromise because it was founded on many unconstitutional grounds. Seward believed that the states were unequal due to slavery, and that slavery should not exist. He thought that slavery was unconstitutional whether classified as property or not, because it is (w as) repugnant to the law of nature and of nations. In no way did Seward catch the compromise constitutional because he felt slavery was unconstitutional.On the flip side, Henry Clay believed that the Compromise of 1850 was a chance for his nation to become reunited. He demonstrated this by addressing the president in A General reexamine of the debate on the Compromise Bills by stating, I believe from the can of my soul, that the measure is the re-union of this Union. I believe that it is the dove of peace, which, taking its aerial escape valve from the dome of the capitol, carries the glad tidings of assured peace and restored harmony to all the remotest extremities of this distracted land. Its clear that Clay believed the compromise was drawn out for the betterment of his young nation, in hopes that it would reconcile their sectional differences, and become one whole nation again. In 1850, many believed that the Compromise of 1850 had solved the sectional conflicts between the Northern free-soilers and the Southern slave holders. Although there were those who opposed the compromise, for the time being it managed to ease the tension between a divided nation.Although the Compromise of 1850 was an act in which all parties had to give up important ground, it allowed the nation to momentarily fade into bliss for a couple of years. Its unexpressed to believe that the expansionists of our country would have predicted these problems while trying to improve our country. Our nations manifest destiny at the time seemed to be the rejoinder to improve upon a young nation, but the newly acquired territories from Mexico only touched up intense emotions and caused for greater division within the nation. Although the Compromise of 1850 managed to ease tension, it ultimately did not cease sectional conflict.