Case Study: Rule Utilitarianism or Act Utilitarianism? Essay

This paper examines the procedure that were followed that it is a common plenitude to see on the street, children and sometimes old, physically handicapped, beggars and sickly people begging for food and some bullion. It critically examines these procedures in the moral dilemma with advert of applying the concepts tackle and act utilitarianism. Should we give these beggars money or not? In deciding whether we give or not, the answer for that is we should give. Why? Act utilitarianism fundamentally states that an action is moral if it produces the greatest pleasure for the just almost people.This reason wholly the act of giving them would be a good idea, because it would benefit the most nub of people. At a first glance in the problem, by just wishing them to just go away, ignoring and disappear from our sight is in a flash immoral. Youre giving them pain despite the rule of greatest gladness and pleasure utilitarianism. However in the contrary it is really redress that by giving it encourages them to become lazy and to be dependent on us, only when what we argon looking here is our act how we respond to them.That is our focal brain giving them or not giving them by the prospect of utilitarianism in which we should act in such way that our actions produce the greatest happiness or pleasure. Whatever will be the consequences on how they used the money were out of that. If we reflect off of the act utilitarianism it is all about happiness the pleasure that is produced by the action. If we dont give them even the smallest amount of money, we feel guilty and there is no pleasure. Here is that we will be viewed and judged as being moral through our actions.With this case, it was stated that is it not full-strength that these people film the money much than we do, right here and right now? The truth is it is really true that they need the money more than we do because why would they be asking money if they didnt need it? And see? The effect of gi ving them is pleasure. In terms of my own feelings, exploitation the act utilitarianism is the better option with regards to the problem of this case than rule utilitarianism. instruction on how we act, what are our actions, and especially the importance of the act of giving.In rule utilitarianism, we all have different rules on what we do. For example, the rules that govern my action are really not to give them money because of believing that it encourages them to be lazy and dependent. For me, it is a pleasure. But lets try to think about others? The majority? Where is now the happiness for the most amount of people? Thats why act utilitarianism for me is the better option. It enables me to provide a strong ground in this problem. Finally, no matter what really is the right concept here in this particular dilemma, all things that work for good are virtuously right.