'A Critique of Aristotle Politics\r'

'Introduction This publisher aims to talk ab off the thoughts of Aristotle as the philosopher of his time. The paper willing examine the applicability of his ideas in the mankindkind at once. It will analyze the ethics of Aristotle against the way to mean solar day’s g everywherenance. This paper will offer an in radiation diagramed critique of Aristotle’s governance. The paper will discuss the prepositions of Aristotle and the merits and demerits associated with each lead. Discussion Aristotle politics looks at the universe scientific all in ally and can differentiate the high-flown and the practical.In his guard one of politics, Aristotle outlines the different types of organizations that he perceives. In each of these types of governance, he gives the sound and the bad. According to Aristotle, the philosopher king is the ideal governance. In this solve, the kings’ interest is in the welf ar of his volume (Tacitus & vitamin A; Benario 18). The hi ghest form of governance is the monarchy. It is hereditary in nature, and mountain can associate freely with the munificent family. In a monarchy, the interests of the nation take anteriority above all other matters. When the respectable lead of a monarchy becomes rogue, Aristotle terms it as tyranny.When leadhip becomes ego seeking the citizens of this call down, suffers thus; can non achieve delight (Chuska 277). Aristotle considers overlordness of philosophers to be the second best leadership. When this form of leadership gets crooked, it becomes oligarchy. Further, he views democracy as the worst form of leadership. In his whimsy, the third best form of leadership is one whose command would combine all the noble forms of leadership. According to Aristotle, a polity is a constitution. Aristotle is of the opinion that, for a polity to be viable, it has to consider the constancy and security of its people.The aristocracy as Aristotle puts it is the rule of several. W hen a virtuous rule of law prevails the friendship enjoys solidity. In this rule, the needs of the wealthy get priority enchantment the rest of the population gets neglected. This brings some air division division, and favoritism on the basis of riches. The elite in the community protect and guard their status making it grueling to join the elite pigeonholing from low class people. According to Aristotle, who was advocating for fairness, elitism in the society is wrong (Chuska 278). enactment is the rule of the majority. This is what Aristotle refers to as the rule of many.In the better form, it concerns with the needy. The leaders take office through and through an election. It is the citizens of the state who squ atomic number 18 up the somebody to rule over them. When this form of leadership becomes fraudulent, Aristotle refers to it as democracy. As Aristotle puts it when the mob rules the minority group suffers. However, in the opinion of Aristotle this befoul form o f polity is the best form of governance in the broad run (Aristotle et al 297). In Aristotle’s compendium of the best form of a leader, he says it is that somebody who pursues virtue. To him virtues are decent habits acquired through legislation and moral education.According to Aristotle, leaders should not work; it is the state to try for their needs. They should ready property and sufficient time for leisure. This will enable them to pursue virtues. This practice is only potential in a monarchy. The views of Aristotle about a monarchy are noble. In the history of romish Empire, at that place is a short duration when there was monarchy. The leaders commonly known as the five good empires operated a monarchy with success. The rule was successful without turning to dictatorship. Their interest was in the subjects. They resisted the allure of abusing the unlimited exponent of their rule.The emperor who took over from the last of the five was Commodus. He started out ea sily following the ideals of a monarch. However, he gradually became corrupt. He started to make laws that were not pleasing to the people. The rules he make were not logical, and the people of the empire were unhappy. He do by the virtues of a leader and started barking orders at a whim. He died by assassination by strangulation in his bath (Aristotle et al 300). This classic example gives reality to the opinions of Aristotle. Monarchy is a worthy form of leadership; however, when corrupt it is the worst form.According to Aristotle the second best form of government activity is aristocracy. Before the formation of the Roman Empire, there was the Roman commonwealth. There was the rule of law in the republic; it lasted for four hundred years, an unusually long duration. aristocracy may have succeeded within this duration, but it has the helplessness that people do not involve the person to lead them. However, it finally failed when power became centralized. Aristotle advocates for balance mingled with the one, few and many. This is a form of mixed government where the virtues of all the six forms of government combined.According to him this would bring stableness and avoid the dangers that a monarchy poses to the society. In the world, today this form of government can be seen in the join Kingdom and the United States. There is a power balance among the three basic components stated by Aristotle. This brings about constancy in the society (Chuska 278). Aristotle, in his politics, discusses how a state associates with it members. He maintains that the legitimacy of a government remains through serving it people and offering them a healthy life. According to Aristotle the happiness of the citizens is state is crucial.In his discourse, Aristotle talks of the contentment of the entire state, not just a segment of the state. The perfect society is one whose citizens show moral virtues this is achievable through an ideal government (Chuska 279). Aristotle pu ts emphasis on the human beings achieving their potentiality. According to him the successful government has to have citizens to choose the needs for their lives. A critical evaluation of the politics of Aristotle shows an inclination towards communism and authoritarianism. However, in todays world the or so successful forms of government are the representative democracies.This is because they implicate all the groups within the state without leaving out of the minority. The form of government that Aristotle proposes is practical. His concern is in the stability and security of the citizens. The members of a state need security in order to run their day to day activities. Thus, if there is a lack of order in the leadership the citizens suffer. Aristotle proposes a constitution which he calls a polity. He sees it as a long constant solution to leadership problems as it offers a cover form of governance. In the contemporary world, we have all forms of governments as discussed by A ristotle.The most successful ones are the democracy. Though they have their short falls, they are more than practical compared with other forms of governments. The state has a province towards the people; however, the people also have a responsibility for themselves. The world is competitive, and people cannot wait for the state to take care of them (Tacitus ; Benario 19). In conclusion, Aristotles politics have an influence on political philosophy up to the present time. They contain thought provoking concerns about politics that governments should consider the quality of the life of their subject. He questions who should be the ruler of the people.Aristotle is keen to emphasize on the moral expectation and obligation of the state and their citizens. A state has to have citizens and the citizens have to have a state. The two must exist together and for that to be, there must be rulers. Works cited Chuska, J. (2000). Aristotles best government: A reading of Aristotles authoritie s, VII. 1-10. Lanham, Md: University Press of America. Tacitus, C. , & Benario, H. W. (2006). Agricola, Germany, and Dialogue on orators. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Aristotle, . , Bekker, I. , Bolland, W. E. , Lang, A. , & Aristotle, . (1877). Aristotles Politics: Books I. III. IV. (VII. ). London: Longmans, Green.\r\n'